Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_11.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=CUUG FASTA(n).Sequence=CUUG
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:24:14
Evaluating how sequences fit models
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.84, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.89, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.89, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.22, deficit  0.01, CutoffScore  68.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
ACGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.18, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  43.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.22, deficit  0.01, CutoffScore  68.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -6.34, deficit  2.15, CutoffScore  77.36, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.60, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -5.63, deficit -1.04, CutoffScore  47.79, ed  2, 2 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  88.68, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.29, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.83, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score     -10.13, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  37.67, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.22, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  68.24, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCCAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -3.29, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCGUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.50, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  54.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.42, deficit  1.33, CutoffScore  54.47, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUUGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -5.11, deficit  1.44, CutoffScore  84.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.65, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.38, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  87.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUGAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.67, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGCUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.23, deficit  2.02, CutoffScore  47.18, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.50, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore  63.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.44, deficit  0.91, CutoffScore  58.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCCGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  34.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UAAGA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.76, deficit  1.22, CutoffScore  55.59, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.46, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.77, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.96, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  53.39, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -7.13, deficit  2.14, CutoffScore  77.43, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.49, deficit  0.39, CutoffScore  64.31, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAUCG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.20, deficit  3.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.37, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  34.79, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  34.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAAAA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.12, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.67, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -6.45, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  34.74, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAUUG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.82, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  91.48, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CACAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.05, deficit  1.52, CutoffScore  84.04, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.50, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore  63.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.30, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  75.13, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCCGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.44, deficit  0.91, CutoffScore  58.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGUGC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.10, deficit  1.57, CutoffScore  51.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUCAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.68, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  63.39, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.65, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.67, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  68.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.50, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  75.74, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  55.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUUUA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.41, deficit  0.40, CutoffScore  95.80, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.75, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  59.88, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.32, deficit  1.38, CutoffScore  53.90, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.82, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  58.72, ed  2, 0 cWW-cWS-F                               
UGGGCA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.84, deficit -0.08, CutoffScore  37.67, ed  4, 2 cWW                                     
CGUAAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.49, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  81.96, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AAGCGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -7.01, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  58.79, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGCCC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.12, CutoffScore  56.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAGCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.66, deficit  4.90, CutoffScore  48.95, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCUACC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.35, deficit  2.23, CutoffScore  44.99, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
UCGGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -6.85, deficit  0.48, CutoffScore  31.77, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GCGACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.16, deficit  0.95, CutoffScore  26.84, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGCAUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.79, deficit  5.03, CutoffScore  47.53, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CACAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.38, deficit  1.45, CutoffScore  53.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCGGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.77, deficit -0.15, CutoffScore  38.39, ed  2, 2 cWW                                     
UGUUAA 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.11, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.22, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AAGGUU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -5.67, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  60.12, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
UCCAAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.50, deficit  1.37, CutoffScore  53.99, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUAUG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.09, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  62.45, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUAUGA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.59, deficit -0.64, CutoffScore  43.58, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.35, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  52.10, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGAGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.13, deficit  6.37, CutoffScore  33.64, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGUGGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -8.25, deficit  3.71, CutoffScore  60.91, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCGGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -7.08, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  45.29, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
CGCGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.72, deficit -0.20, CutoffScore  70.53, ed  1, 1 cWW                                     
GUCGUC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.29, deficit -0.31, CutoffScore  71.69, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.94, deficit  3.18, CutoffScore  66.89, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AAACAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.45, deficit  2.52, CutoffScore  73.48, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GCGCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -8.42, deficit  2.58, CutoffScore  41.26, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -4.98, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  66.43, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUGGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.91, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  28.27, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUCUGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.38, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  35.33, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
AUCAAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.56, deficit  6.80, CutoffScore  29.15, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCAUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.87, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  62.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGCUUU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.25, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  64.97, ed  3, 1 cWW                                     
AAAAAU 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.30, deficit  5.55, CutoffScore  42.19, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.58, deficit  4.82, CutoffScore  49.71, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCCUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -8.25, deficit  3.13, CutoffScore  35.45, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAUCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.75, deficit  1.07, CutoffScore  57.11, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AAAGGU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score     -10.39, deficit  8.64, CutoffScore   9.98, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.20, deficit  3.00, CutoffScore  68.46, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.20, deficit  1.31, CutoffScore  54.58, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
AGCAGU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.21, deficit  6.45, CutoffScore  32.73, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAUUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_86883.1,  5 NTs,                GUAUUC,score      -4.47, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  78.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGUUC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.30, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCAUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.87, deficit  0.57, CutoffScore  62.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAUCCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -3.93, deficit  0.21, CutoffScore  67.75, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUGAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.65, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  59.45, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.35, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  52.10, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCUUUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -8.57, deficit  2.44, CutoffScore  74.32, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGGUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.97, deficit  0.09, CutoffScore  99.06, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-cSH                               
CAACUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_82710.2,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -7.08, deficit  2.74, CutoffScore  71.13, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCCCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -9.30, deficit  2.83, CutoffScore  38.63, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCACGAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.28, deficit  0.68, CutoffScore  61.26, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGGUAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -8.08, deficit  1.98, CutoffScore  47.58, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCCUCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -9.32, deficit  2.64, CutoffScore   9.02, ed  2, 2 cWW-F                                   
CAAGUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.05, deficit -0.51, CutoffScore  42.18, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F                               
GGAAUUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.20, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  61.70, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
GAAAGAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.22, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  57.38, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAUCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -7.19, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  29.27, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAGGCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -8.01, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  23.79, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGUAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -7.85, deficit  1.75, CutoffScore  49.97, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAUUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.20, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  61.70, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
GUUCCAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score     -10.11, deficit  3.64, CutoffScore  61.68, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCAAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.96, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.82, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUAGAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.13, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  35.60, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCGGGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.93, deficit  4.50, CutoffScore  14.60, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAUUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.02, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  67.48, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCGCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -11.47, deficit  1.07, CutoffScore  25.55, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCGCAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -5.98, deficit  2.63, CutoffScore  57.44, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
UGCCGAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -8.45, deficit  3.98, CutoffScore  58.16, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.09, deficit  2.00, CutoffScore  47.40, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUUUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.54, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  57.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGUGCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -8.48, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  63.97, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGAGAAU 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.67, deficit  7.91, CutoffScore  17.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAGCCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.86, deficit  2.14, CutoffScore  48.36, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCAUUGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -7.03, deficit  0.54, CutoffScore  66.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUCAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.83, CutoffScore  47.26, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.89, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCUUUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.74, deficit  1.31, CutoffScore  40.88, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CGUAAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.40, deficit  5.64, CutoffScore  41.22, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAGAUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.01, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.08, deficit  6.32, CutoffScore  34.08, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAAGCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -5.81, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  66.06, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  86.40, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCAAAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.68, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  57.01, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUUGCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -7.73, deficit -0.50, CutoffScore  42.12, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCUGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -8.09, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  28.28, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GCGGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_82710.2,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -7.70, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  32.96, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGAAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.38, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  44.43, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGAGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -7.89, deficit  3.42, CutoffScore  32.44, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCGGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -10.04, deficit  4.10, CutoffScore  25.24, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGUCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.66, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.82, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
UUCCGAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -8.12, deficit  2.45, CutoffScore  42.64, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CCAUUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -8.42, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  43.85, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUUAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -5.34, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  97.55, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUAGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.33, deficit  0.90, CutoffScore  58.98, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUCUAAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -7.75, deficit  2.65, CutoffScore  43.94, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUUUGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -6.46, deficit  1.36, CutoffScore  86.47, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCGUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.45, deficit  3.52, CutoffScore  31.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.02, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  67.48, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.87, deficit  1.40, CutoffScore  22.14, ed  2, 2 cWW-F                                   
CGAAAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score      -8.83, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  37.47, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UCAGGUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.62, deficit  2.14, CutoffScore  29.24, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCGACAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -9.14, deficit  3.35, CutoffScore  40.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAUUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -7.74, deficit  1.69, CutoffScore  50.65, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGGAAGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.17, deficit  0.43, CutoffScore  37.90, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCCUGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -13.24, deficit  7.67, CutoffScore  23.35, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
UAUAAAAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -6.75, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  68.21, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAACAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.92, deficit  1.91, CutoffScore  16.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUGUAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -9.21, deficit  4.77, CutoffScore  37.13, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CGUCAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_00914.1,  6 NTs,              GGUCAAAC,score      -7.15, deficit  1.66, CutoffScore  85.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCUGCCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.04, deficit  4.61, CutoffScore  51.83, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAGAUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.66, deficit  1.64, CutoffScore  29.88, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GUGUGUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -6.47, deficit  2.71, CutoffScore  64.44, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUCAGAGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.00, deficit  3.57, CutoffScore  39.45, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGCGUUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.68, deficit  0.66, CutoffScore  38.85, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
UGAGGAUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -7.60, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  46.77, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAACGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -7.18, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  33.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAGUUACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -11.32, deficit  4.61, CutoffScore  16.04, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
CAUGGCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -8.56, deficit  2.77, CutoffScore  46.12, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGAGAUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.25, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  40.32, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
UGAAAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score     -10.77, deficit  4.32, CutoffScore  22.92, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGAGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -7.46, deficit  2.70, CutoffScore  54.44, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CCAUAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99748.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -9.19, deficit  2.49, CutoffScore   9.09, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-cSH                             
CUUUCAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.17, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  60.78, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUUAGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -7.22, deficit -0.51, CutoffScore  75.97, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAGAAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.19, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  61.97, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCUCUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_26934.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -6.08, deficit  2.32, CutoffScore  66.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGAUACGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.74, deficit  5.38, CutoffScore  24.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUUUCCGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.01, deficit  5.58, CutoffScore  26.74, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGUGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -9.21, deficit  6.48, CutoffScore  23.92, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -5.81, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  41.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGAUGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -8.23, deficit  1.80, CutoffScore  39.13, ed  3, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAAAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.80, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  49.56, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAGAUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.19, deficit  1.45, CutoffScore  28.04, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCUGCAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.16, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  93.81, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAACCCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -11.07, deficit  3.06, CutoffScore  16.91, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GGUAUAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_00914.1,  6 NTs,              GGUCAAAC,score      -6.59, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  36.60, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCUCAAGA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.75, deficit  4.16, CutoffScore  35.31, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGAUUAUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score     -11.23, deficit  5.29, CutoffScore  12.69, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCUAAACG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score      -6.92, deficit -0.59, CutoffScore  51.36, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAUUCAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.43, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  40.44, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
GGGCUAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85993.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.63, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  33.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUACAUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -12.98, deficit  9.88, CutoffScore  15.89, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CUGACGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.53, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  24.79, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGAAAGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -9.70, deficit  4.12, CutoffScore  24.65, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGCAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_10540.1,  7 NTs,               CCGAAGG,score      -7.62, deficit  0.41, CutoffScore  67.19, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUUUAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  57.11, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
CGACAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -5.80, deficit  1.89, CutoffScore  61.08, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAAAGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.31, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAUAAUAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -12.64, deficit  2.24, CutoffScore  44.89, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCUAAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score      -9.30, deficit  1.27, CutoffScore  33.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAAAGUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.98, deficit  7.16, CutoffScore  35.75, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CUUACCAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score      -9.51, deficit  3.93, CutoffScore  51.29, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AUUAAAUGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -8.52, deficit  3.23, CutoffScore  34.14, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUCUGAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -11.73, deficit  6.43, CutoffScore  13.59, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUCUAUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -9.24, deficit  0.99, CutoffScore  42.31, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
AUUCAAAAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_06059.6,  9 NTs,             CUUCCCAAG,score      -6.34, deficit  1.59, CutoffScore  65.55, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAACAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -10.45, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  18.35, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
GGAAAAGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score     -11.19, deficit  5.76, CutoffScore   9.94, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
GGUAGUUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -8.83, deficit  3.54, CutoffScore  31.91, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUAGAGACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score      -9.93, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  40.87, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGAGAAACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.64, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore   8.94, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAUCUUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.85, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore  36.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUACUUUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.65, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  24.60, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
GGUACAAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_00914.1,  6 NTs,              GGUCAAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  3.98, CutoffScore  37.69, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUAUAAUA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -9.36, deficit  3.93, CutoffScore  46.94, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
GUCAAAAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -7.53, deficit  2.10, CutoffScore  37.92, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CGAAACCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.82, deficit  5.53, CutoffScore  30.62, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGUUCCGUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score      -8.81, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  32.22, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGGUCAAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_85993.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score     -12.42, deficit  7.07, CutoffScore  18.75, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGGUGACUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -15.51, deficit  7.20, CutoffScore  11.75, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAAGACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -9.77, deficit  4.86, CutoffScore  36.44, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUAAAUUUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.67, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  32.28, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCAAAGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -7.02, deficit  1.59, CutoffScore  41.84, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CUAUUAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score      -9.75, deficit  3.33, CutoffScore  27.26, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAGACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -8.91, deficit  5.00, CutoffScore  12.43, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCGGUUAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.71, deficit  3.62, CutoffScore  41.61, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CACUAUUAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -11.03, deficit  0.63, CutoffScore  30.25, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAACUGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.86, deficit  3.50, CutoffScore  36.67, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUGUUGGAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -11.19, deficit  5.01, CutoffScore  41.34, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
CGAGGGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.83, deficit  1.09, CutoffScore  45.76, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCGAGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_33983.1,  7 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -9.94, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  11.01, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGACACAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score     -11.52, deficit  7.60, CutoffScore  15.59, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GACGAAAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -10.58, deficit  5.95, CutoffScore  44.29, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
AUAAUCUUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -8.78, deficit  3.44, CutoffScore  27.46, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
GAUUAUUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.90, deficit  2.08, CutoffScore  48.63, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUAAUGGGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score      -8.51, deficit  2.31, CutoffScore  10.52, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CUCGAAAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score      -7.88, deficit  3.25, CutoffScore  23.76, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
CUCUCGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score     -13.14, deficit  4.89, CutoffScore  10.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CUGACUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score     -10.83, deficit  2.80, CutoffScore  19.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUGUCACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score      -8.28, deficit  2.70, CutoffScore  59.96, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAACAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -8.91, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  31.52, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
UUUUAAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -13.00, deficit  7.70, CutoffScore   6.51, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAUUGACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score     -11.72, deficit  4.25, CutoffScore  10.96, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGUGCCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.00, deficit  3.66, CutoffScore  22.70, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
CUGAGUUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -9.69, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore  41.81, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGCGAAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_73266.9,  9 NTs,             GCCUUAAAC,score      -9.29, deficit  4.50, CutoffScore  27.53, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                       
UGGUUCCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -9.89, deficit  3.05, CutoffScore  53.26, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGUGUUACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -8.56, deficit -0.17, CutoffScore  32.51, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGAGUAUUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -14.20, deficit  6.91, CutoffScore   4.23, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GACUGCUAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -8.97, deficit  3.25, CutoffScore  18.39, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
UUAUAUCUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -14.82, deficit  9.49, CutoffScore   6.14, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCAAAAUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -12.34, deficit  8.06, CutoffScore   4.85, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUGAAUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -12.51, deficit  4.20, CutoffScore  11.76, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGCGGCGGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.39, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  30.89, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAUAAGGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -12.95, deficit  5.66, CutoffScore  11.78, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAAUUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -11.83, deficit  2.49, CutoffScore  36.46, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCGUGUUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -10.67, deficit  3.54, CutoffScore  19.92, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CGAGCCCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -18.76, deficit 11.64, CutoffScore   9.88, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGAUGAAGAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -14.07, deficit  4.77, CutoffScore  34.84, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
UCCGAGGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.59, deficit  2.45, CutoffScore  23.93, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCCGAAUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.60, deficit  2.51, CutoffScore  30.15, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CGUGAAUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score     -12.47, deficit  4.44, CutoffScore  31.67, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUAACUGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.72, deficit  5.58, CutoffScore   3.14, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUAAGAUUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -4.87, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  96.72, ed  0, 0 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CUCGUGAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.39, deficit  7.41, CutoffScore  42.21, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUUUGGAUAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -12.00, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  24.25, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGGCGAGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -10.40, deficit  3.12, CutoffScore  27.09, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAAAUGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -14.10, deficit  8.73, CutoffScore   1.76, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GUAAGGGGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.20, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  25.23, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAGAACACUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.15, deficit  3.41, CutoffScore  18.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCAAAAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -10.41, deficit  2.10, CutoffScore   5.77, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUGCAAGGUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score      -9.78, deficit  4.44, CutoffScore  31.74, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGUUGCAAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -5.73, deficit  0.01, CutoffScore  79.93, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
CUUUCCAAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -11.67, deficit  2.75, CutoffScore  32.19, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
CGUUAAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score      -7.81, deficit  2.09, CutoffScore  66.08, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
GGAAUUUAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -13.60, deficit  4.25, CutoffScore   0.79, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGACAGUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.29, deficit  4.95, CutoffScore  29.19, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGAUCCUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -15.37, deficit  6.08, CutoffScore   8.80, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
CUAGAAGUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score      -9.95, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  20.60, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
GUUAUUGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.84, deficit  1.70, CutoffScore  28.94, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUCUGACGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -14.53, deficit  5.66, CutoffScore   1.91, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAUUUUGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.34, deficit  3.19, CutoffScore  19.01, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGUUACAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -11.37, deficit  3.29, CutoffScore  25.43, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCUUGUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -13.37, deficit  2.97, CutoffScore   5.57, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCGAAACAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -16.59, deficit  8.28, CutoffScore   4.57, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUAAUUCCAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -11.51, deficit  5.93, CutoffScore  21.06, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAACUAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -14.45, deficit  9.82, CutoffScore   5.59, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UCCGAUUUGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -10.68, deficit  2.59, CutoffScore  29.62, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CUCUCAUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -11.18, deficit  6.11, CutoffScore  14.23, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AAAAAGUGAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.45, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  24.49, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AAACUUUAAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -13.52, deficit  9.18, CutoffScore  24.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
GGUUAACAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -11.24, deficit  2.93, CutoffScore  20.27, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCAAGUCCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -12.48, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore   0.48, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CUAAGCCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -11.58, deficit  2.99, CutoffScore  15.48, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAUAAUCAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -12.23, deficit  2.89, CutoffScore  33.44, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUCGAUGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.09, deficit  5.11, CutoffScore  21.68, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGAACUACUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.08, deficit  7.85, CutoffScore   0.77, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUAAAGGUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -10.34, deficit  5.52, CutoffScore  19.69, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUGACCUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -11.63, deficit  6.81, CutoffScore  20.94, ed  4, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCGGCUGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -14.02, deficit  5.49, CutoffScore  12.00, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAACCGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -12.87, deficit  3.52, CutoffScore   6.25, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUGCAAACAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -14.25, deficit  8.91, CutoffScore   9.04, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAUAAGUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.85, deficit  3.56, CutoffScore  24.04, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
CUAACAAAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -11.97, deficit  7.63, CutoffScore  31.87, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
GAAGAAAAGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -13.80, deficit  5.89, CutoffScore  15.89, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GGUAUAAAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -17.01, deficit  8.75, CutoffScore   7.29, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
AGAAUCCAAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -12.71, deficit  3.71, CutoffScore  62.96, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGUUGAAAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -13.90, deficit  5.59, CutoffScore  22.54, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUACAAACGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.77, deficit  9.70, CutoffScore  19.01, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CAAUAGGAGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -13.64, deficit  5.56, CutoffScore  11.20, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCUGACAUGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.73, deficit  6.65, CutoffScore   5.72, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCUAGCGGCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -11.86, deficit  2.99, CutoffScore  33.42, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCAGAAAGGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -12.67, deficit  3.73, CutoffScore   2.09, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAUCCAGAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -11.45, deficit  3.11, CutoffScore  48.86, ed  2, 2 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAACGUCGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -12.53, deficit  5.41, CutoffScore  41.67, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUGAGAUCCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -13.57, deficit  4.63, CutoffScore  15.16, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAGAACAUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -11.42, deficit  2.42, CutoffScore  36.94, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAAUCCUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -14.01, deficit  5.01, CutoffScore  22.67, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGCGUCCAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -14.72, deficit  5.72, CutoffScore  18.72, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCUUUCUCCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -16.07, deficit  6.07, CutoffScore   0.65, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAACCCGUAUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80411.1,  9 NTs,           CAGCCCGGUAG,score     -13.00, deficit  4.72, CutoffScore  23.58, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F                       
CAAAAUGGACG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.65, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore  23.08, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGUCUUAGUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.49, deficit  5.50, CutoffScore   2.82, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGCCAACCUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -12.63, deficit  5.51, CutoffScore  41.19, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAUCAGAGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.64, deficit  6.86, CutoffScore  20.69, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CUCUGAGCCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.63, deficit  4.89, CutoffScore   5.30, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGUCCAAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -13.64, deficit  5.31, CutoffScore   2.87, ed  4, 4 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UCAGAUCAGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -14.37, deficit  6.28, CutoffScore   7.22, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CGAAGCUAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -13.11, deficit  4.11, CutoffScore  27.63, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAUCGCAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.90, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  24.89, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAGAACGGAAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_80411.1,  9 NTs,           CAGCCCGGUAG,score     -12.61, deficit  4.34, CutoffScore  25.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F                       
CGGAAUUCAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -17.36, deficit  8.35, CutoffScore   4.18, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAUUGGGCGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -10.55, deficit  2.73, CutoffScore  31.45, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAUGGCAUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -12.92, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore  18.67, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAAUUGCGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -13.31, deficit  3.06, CutoffScore   7.98, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CGAUCGGGGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.16, deficit  5.38, CutoffScore  28.10, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CAUGUUUAACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81312.1, 10 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -12.73, deficit  6.44, CutoffScore  16.80, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAAAAUUUUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -12.82, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore   7.86, ed  7, 5 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
GAACCGGAACAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -12.80, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore   7.59, ed  6, 4 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUUGCCGGCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -17.35, deficit  8.48, CutoffScore   2.93, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAUGAAAACUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -13.49, deficit  4.08, CutoffScore   9.45, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUUCCGGGAACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -11.71, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore  13.71, ed  6, 4 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCAGGAAAGGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41902.1, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.16, deficit  5.54, CutoffScore  12.31, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAGUAAAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.09, deficit  6.32, CutoffScore   8.42, ed  6, 4 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CUCUGAAUGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -16.91, deficit  6.17, CutoffScore  14.93, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CUAACCACAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.65, deficit  2.53, CutoffScore  13.01, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUAUUCGUGUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_23509.1, 11 NTs,          GAAUUCAUUUUC,score     -11.71, deficit  6.25, CutoffScore   8.76, ed  6, 4 cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUUAAUCGCAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -15.53, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore   4.51, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UUCAGUGUACUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -17.28, deficit  8.51, CutoffScore   3.91, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GAGCUUUAGGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -13.42, deficit  3.18, CutoffScore  27.02, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGUCGACCGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -12.59, deficit  3.71, CutoffScore  29.38, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAAAAUCGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -13.75, deficit  5.89, CutoffScore  12.45, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAAAAUAAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.66, deficit  6.80, CutoffScore  21.74, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUAAAAUGAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.55, deficit  3.94, CutoffScore  18.85, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUAUUCAGUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23509.1, 11 NTs,          GAAUUCAUUUUC,score      -9.51, deficit  4.05, CutoffScore  49.75, ed  4, 2 cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAAUUCUGAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.45, deficit  5.67, CutoffScore  11.64, ed  5, 4 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
GGAUCAGAAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -13.31, deficit  4.98, CutoffScore  21.56, ed  5, 3 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAGCAAGAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -16.88, deficit  9.11, CutoffScore   9.47, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
CUUACGAAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -16.94, deficit  8.68, CutoffScore   7.73, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAAUCAAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -16.15, deficit  7.15, CutoffScore  10.84, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGCAAAACGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -13.58, deficit  4.70, CutoffScore   7.22, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAAAUGAAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.57, deficit  9.50, CutoffScore   4.62, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GGAACAACAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.99, deficit  6.21, CutoffScore  23.93, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
UAACAAGAGAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.91, deficit  5.84, CutoffScore   8.01, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CGAAACAGUGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.53, deficit  6.46, CutoffScore   4.80, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GGAAUGGACCGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -12.17, deficit  3.87, CutoffScore  31.84, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
CGUUCCAAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -10.01, deficit  1.75, CutoffScore  13.62, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CGAGCUAUUUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -16.19, deficit  5.94, CutoffScore   8.73, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
AGAUUCGAAUUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.01, deficit  4.61, CutoffScore  29.58, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
GACUUAUGGAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12870.1, 12 NTs,         GUCCUUGGGAAAC,score     -13.16, deficit  5.69, CutoffScore   2.52, ed  4, 4 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
GAAAAAUCAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -16.92, deficit  4.77, CutoffScore   1.73, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGCCUCGAAACAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.20, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore  18.21, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CUCAUCGGAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -15.31, deficit  5.31, CutoffScore   5.66, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUUAAUUAUGACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -20.16, deficit  9.39, CutoffScore   3.85, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
AGAAAGCAAAAUAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73183.1, 14 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -20.04, deficit  9.81, CutoffScore   3.30, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F           
UAUUGAAAAGAGAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98870.1, 11 NTs,     CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG,score     -16.22, deficit  6.92, CutoffScore   6.18, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F                   
AGUAAAAGAUGCAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73247.1, 15 NTs,     CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG,score     -15.99, deficit  7.45, CutoffScore   0.84, ed  7, 5 cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F           
CGAUUGGAAGAAGUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73183.1, 14 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -16.92, deficit  6.70, CutoffScore  19.33, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F           
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 92.0000	  6.0000	  2.0000
[11 11]	 80.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 62.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 16.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	  4.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  4.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 76.0000	 66.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 90.0000	 50.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 78.0000	 48.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 50.0000	 20.0000
[8 8]	 98.0000	 30.0000	  4.0000
[9 9]	100.0000	  8.0000	  0.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  37 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence  70 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence  97 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence  99 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence 149 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence 214 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence 216 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 252 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 252 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 253 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 261 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 275 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 277 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 293 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 297 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 308 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 325 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 330 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 331 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 336 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 375 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 376 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 394 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 395 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 422 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 438 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 457 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 491 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 513 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 529 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 550 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 566 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 586 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 630 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 638 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 662 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 682 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 698 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 746 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 801 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 809 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 836 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 962 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 968 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 1091 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 1093 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 1166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 1196 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 1280 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 1307 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 3.0000%
Number of models giving false positives is 234 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     0.66
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     1.19
